![]() ![]() The source, however, explained that it might be possible to reconcile Mr Steele’s apparent reputation for solid thoroughness with all the scepticism about the contents of the dossier. The source added: “I know there is a danger if you are doing a very big case and you are a small company, and you get something that seems really great, that you develop patterns of group think, and you start to believe your stuff – as happened for example with the Niger yellowcake story. Using Brennan’s timeline, the entire intelligence community never considered or possibly knew about the dossier until September 2016, yet the FBI had (1) dispatched Gaetta to London in July, and (2) interviewed Steele and discovered the name of his sources in August 2016. And on a big case you should test the information more than you do on a small case.” Then we have to test the information they supply to us. “I would imagine he worked through Russian subcontractors,” the source said. The document, full of salacious allegations, captured and cleaved America. Trump, then a presidential candidate, and his supposed links to Russia. You can head this off by explaining what you mean before hitting submit.Instead, the source said, Mr Steele may have had to work through Russian subcontractors – who might have a financial incentive to please their paymasters with impressive-looking information, or who may have gossiped with other Russians keen to exaggerate the extent of their knowledge. The Steele Dossier compiled by Christopher Steele, a British former spy was born out of opposition research on Donald J. If you're saying something that's deeply out of the ordinary or difficult-to-defend, the next person is going to ask you to explain what you mean. The Steele Dossier compiled by Christopher Steele, a British former spy was born out of opposition research on Donald. Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be. The Steele Dossier compiled by Christopher Steele, a British former spy was born out of opposition research on Donald. Sarcasm and mockery make it very easy to express that you disagree with someone without explaining why, or what contrary claim you actually endorse, and you can't grow a discussion from those grounds. about how he obtained information that appeared in the dossier. Steele’s was arrested and charged with lying to the F.B.I. To have a discussion on some point of disagreement it is necessary that both parties be willing to say what they believe and why, not merely that they disagree with the other party. Then, this month, a primary source of Mr. Trump, then a presidential candidate, and his supposed links to. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly. The Steele Dossier compiled by Christopher Steele, a British former spy was born out of opposition research on Donald J. Generally, keep your tone civil and try to avoid ad hominem attacks. are not helping anyone and should be avoided. Namecalling ("You're a moron."), bad implications ("Yeah, a troll would say that."), accusations ("You're just a shill!"), inflammatory language ("Anyone who thinks this is a moron!"), etc. While arguing is unavoidable, personally attacking individuals is never okay. No personal attacks, witch-hunts, bigotry, or inflammatory language. Reddit has a set of sitewide rules that can be found here. Rules for r/ThedailyĪdhere to sitewide Reddit rules. The biggest stories of our time, told by the best journalists in the world. This subreddit is a place to share your thoughts, ask questions, and discuss The NYTimes podcast The Daily and the various topics it covers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |